Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Assessing Trustworthy AI in Times of COVID-19: Deep Learning for Predicting a Multiregional Score Conveying the Degree of Lung Compromise in COVID-19 Patients

  • Himanshi Allahabadi
  • , Julia Amann
  • , Isabelle Balot
  • , Andrea Beretta
  • , Charles Binkley
  • , Jonas Bozenhard
  • , Frederick Bruneault
  • , James Brusseau
  • , Sema Candemir
  • , Luca Alessandro Cappellini
  • , Subrata Chakraborty
  • , Nicoleta Cherciu
  • , Christina Cociancig
  • , Megan Coffee
  • , Irene Ek
  • , Leonardo Espinosa-Leal
  • , Davide Farina
  • , Genevieve Fieux-Castagnet
  • , Thomas Frauenfelder
  • , Alessio Gallucci
  • Guya Giuliani, Adam Golda, Irmhild Van Halem, Elisabeth Hildt, Sune Holm, Georgios Kararigas, Sebastien A. Krier, Ulrich Kuhne, Francesca Lizzi, Vince I. Madai, Aniek F. Markus, Serg Masis, Emilie Wiinblad Mathez, Francesco Mureddu, Emanuele Neri, Walter Osika, Matiss Ozols, Cecilia Panigutti, Brendan Parent, Francesca Pratesi, Pedro A. Moreno-Sanchez, Giovanni Sartor, Mattia Savardi, Alberto Signoroni, Hanna Maria Sormunen, Andy Spezzatti, Adarsh Srivastava, Annette F. Stephansen, Lau Bee Theng, Jesmin Jahan Tithi, Jarno Tuominen, Steven Umbrello, Filippo Vaccher, Dennis Vetter, Magnus Westerlund, Renee Wurth, Roberto V. Zicari*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Enterprise Intelligence Department
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
  • Postgraduate Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations
  • National Research Council of Italy
  • Hackensack Meridian Health
  • Philosophie Department
  • Université du Québec à Montréal
  • Pace University
  • The Ohio State University
  • IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas - Rozzano (Milano)
  • Humanitas University
  • University of New England
  • University of Technology Sydney
  • Sant'Anna School of Advanced Studies
  • University of Bremen
  • New York University
  • Ai Research Section
  • Arcada University of Applied Sciences
  • University of Brescia
  • SNCF
  • University of Zurich
  • Eindhoven University of Technology
  • Ericsson AB
  • Department of Cardiology
  • Z-Inspection® Initiative
  • Illinois Institute of Technology
  • University of Copenhagen
  • University of Iceland
  • Stanford University
  • Department for Dermatology
  • Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa
  • Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • Birmingham City University
  • Erasmus University Rotterdam
  • Syngenta
  • Policy Research Centre Sport
  • University of Pisa
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • University of Manchester
  • Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute
  • Seinäjoki University of Applied Sciences
  • European University Institute, San Domenico di Fiesole
  • University of Bologna
  • Advanced Analytics
  • Ai for Good Foundation
  • University of California at Berkeley
  • Roche
  • Norwegian Research Centre
  • Swinburne University of Technology
  • Intel
  • Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Stony Brook University
  • University of Turku
  • Delft University of Technology (TU Delft)
  • Kristiania University College
  • Harvard University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

35 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article's main contributions are twofold: 1) to demonstrate how to apply the general European Union's High-Level Expert Group's (EU HLEG) guidelines for trustworthy AI in practice for the domain of healthcare and 2) to investigate the research question of what does 'trustworthy AI' mean at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic. To this end, we present the results of a post-hoc self-assessment to evaluate the trustworthiness of an AI system for predicting a multiregional score conveying the degree of lung compromise in COVID-19 patients, developed and verified by an interdisciplinary team with members from academia, public hospitals, and industry in time of pandemic. The AI system aims to help radiologists to estimate and communicate the severity of damage in a patient's lung from Chest X-rays. It has been experimentally deployed in the radiology department of the ASST Spedali Civili clinic in Brescia, Italy, since December 2020 during pandemic time. The methodology we have applied for our post-hoc assessment, called Z-Inspection®, uses sociotechnical scenarios to identify ethical, technical, and domain-specific issues in the use of the AI system in the context of the pandemic.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)272-289
Number of pages18
JournalIEEE Transactions on Technology and Society
Volume3
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2022
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Artificial intelligence
  • COVID-19
  • Z-Inspection®
  • case study
  • ethical tradeoff
  • ethics
  • explainable AI
  • healthcare
  • pandemic
  • radiology
  • trust
  • trustworthy AI

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing Trustworthy AI in Times of COVID-19: Deep Learning for Predicting a Multiregional Score Conveying the Degree of Lung Compromise in COVID-19 Patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this