TY - JOUR
T1 - CATARACTS
T2 - Challenge on automatic tool annotation for cataRACT surgery
AU - Al Hajj, Hassan
AU - Lamard, Mathieu
AU - Conze, Pierre Henri
AU - Roychowdhury, Soumali
AU - Hu, Xiaowei
AU - Maršalkaitė, Gabija
AU - Zisimopoulos, Odysseas
AU - Dedmari, Muneer Ahmad
AU - Zhao, Fenqiang
AU - Prellberg, Jonas
AU - Sahu, Manish
AU - Galdran, Adrian
AU - Araújo, Teresa
AU - Vo, Duc My
AU - Panda, Chandan
AU - Dahiya, Navdeep
AU - Kondo, Satoshi
AU - Bian, Zhengbing
AU - Vahdat, Arash
AU - Bialopetravičius, Jonas
AU - Flouty, Evangello
AU - Qiu, Chenhui
AU - Dill, Sabrina
AU - Mukhopadhyay, Anirban
AU - Costa, Pedro
AU - Aresta, Guilherme
AU - Ramamurthy, Senthil
AU - Lee, Sang Woong
AU - Campilho, Aurélio
AU - Zachow, Stefan
AU - Xia, Shunren
AU - Conjeti, Sailesh
AU - Stoyanov, Danail
AU - Armaitis, Jogundas
AU - Heng, Pheng Ann
AU - Macready, William G.
AU - Cochener, Béatrice
AU - Quellec, Gwenolé
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2019/2
Y1 - 2019/2
N2 - Surgical tool detection is attracting increasing attention from the medical image analysis community. The goal generally is not to precisely locate tools in images, but rather to indicate which tools are being used by the surgeon at each instant. The main motivation for annotating tool usage is to design efficient solutions for surgical workflow analysis, with potential applications in report generation, surgical training and even real-time decision support. Most existing tool annotation algorithms focus on laparoscopic surgeries. However, with 19 million interventions per year, the most common surgical procedure in the world is cataract surgery. The CATARACTS challenge was organized in 2017 to evaluate tool annotation algorithms in the specific context of cataract surgery. It relies on more than nine hours of videos, from 50 cataract surgeries, in which the presence of 21 surgical tools was manually annotated by two experts. With 14 participating teams, this challenge can be considered a success. As might be expected, the submitted solutions are based on deep learning. This paper thoroughly evaluates these solutions: in particular, the quality of their annotations are compared to that of human interpretations. Next, lessons learnt from the differential analysis of these solutions are discussed. We expect that they will guide the design of efficient surgery monitoring tools in the near future.
AB - Surgical tool detection is attracting increasing attention from the medical image analysis community. The goal generally is not to precisely locate tools in images, but rather to indicate which tools are being used by the surgeon at each instant. The main motivation for annotating tool usage is to design efficient solutions for surgical workflow analysis, with potential applications in report generation, surgical training and even real-time decision support. Most existing tool annotation algorithms focus on laparoscopic surgeries. However, with 19 million interventions per year, the most common surgical procedure in the world is cataract surgery. The CATARACTS challenge was organized in 2017 to evaluate tool annotation algorithms in the specific context of cataract surgery. It relies on more than nine hours of videos, from 50 cataract surgeries, in which the presence of 21 surgical tools was manually annotated by two experts. With 14 participating teams, this challenge can be considered a success. As might be expected, the submitted solutions are based on deep learning. This paper thoroughly evaluates these solutions: in particular, the quality of their annotations are compared to that of human interpretations. Next, lessons learnt from the differential analysis of these solutions are discussed. We expect that they will guide the design of efficient surgery monitoring tools in the near future.
KW - Cataract surgery
KW - Challenge
KW - Deep learning
KW - Video analysis
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85056882828
U2 - 10.1016/j.media.2018.11.008
DO - 10.1016/j.media.2018.11.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 30468970
AN - SCOPUS:85056882828
SN - 1361-8415
VL - 52
SP - 24
EP - 41
JO - Medical Image Analysis
JF - Medical Image Analysis
ER -