Cobalt metal-organic framework-based ZIF-67 for the trace determination of herbicide molinate by ion mobility spectrometry: investigation of different morphologies

  • Mehdi Davoodi
  • , Fatemeh Davar
  • , Mohammad R. Rezayat
  • , Mohammad T. Jafari
  • , Ahmed Esmail Shalan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

45 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Co-MOF-based zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (ZIF-67) with various morphologies were prepared via an innovative way under distinct reaction conditions. By changing the reaction conditions, including the cobalt source, solvent, time, temperature, and linking agent to the cobalt ions, the morphological evolution of Co-MOF-based ZIF-67 was investigated. The Co-MOF-based ZIF-67 was applied as an adsorbent fiber in the solid-phase microextraction (SPME) technique for extracting a herbicide, namely molinate (as a test compound), in aqueous samples. For recognizing the molinate molecules, drift tube ion mobility spectrometry (IMS) was employed as a sensitive, rapid, and simple detection technique. Two essential parameters, namely extraction temperature and extraction time, influenced the extraction efficiency, and these parameters were also analyzed and optimized. The linear dynamic range (LDR) and the determination coefficient were found to be 0.5-20.0 μg L-1 and 0.9990, respectively. In this regard, the limit of quantification (LOQ) and the detection limit (LOD) were calculated and found to be 0.5 μg L-1 and 0.15 μg L-1, respectively. Finally, the effect of the adsorbent with different morphologies on the extraction efficiency was compared.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2643-2655
Number of pages13
JournalRSC Advances
Volume11
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Jan 2021
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cobalt metal-organic framework-based ZIF-67 for the trace determination of herbicide molinate by ion mobility spectrometry: investigation of different morphologies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this