Comparing SPI survival studies in small settings

Xabier Larrucea*, Izaskun Santamaria

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Small organisations have been applying several quality approaches such as CMMI-DEV or ISO/IEC 15504-5 with quite diverse results. In order to build an experience factory we are gathering our experiences in a database containing the assessment results of more than 90 initiatives. This paper provides an empirical comparison of survival analysis for different improvement initiatives in the context of very small entities. We compare the Cox Proportional Hazard Regression models of our 90 initiatives, and we discriminated them by the reference model used: ISO/IEC29110, CMMI-DEV or ITMark.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSoftware Process Improvement and Capability Determination - 17th International Conference, SPICE 2017, Proceedings
EditorsRory V. O’Connor, Antonia Mas, Terry Rout, Antoni Mesquida, Alec Dorling
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages45-54
Number of pages10
ISBN (Print)9783319673820
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Event17th International Conference on Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, SPICE 2017 - Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Duration: 4 Oct 20175 Oct 2017

Publication series

NameCommunications in Computer and Information Science
Volume770
ISSN (Print)1865-0929

Conference

Conference17th International Conference on Software Process Improvement and Capability Determination, SPICE 2017
Country/TerritorySpain
CityPalma de Mallorca
Period4/10/175/10/17

Keywords

  • ISO/IEC2 9110
  • Product life cycle
  • Survival analysis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing SPI survival studies in small settings'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this