Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparing the safety of bunkering LH2 and LNG using quantitative risk assessment with a focus on ignition hazards—Sensitivity analysis

  • Jorgen Depken*
  • , Lars Baetcke
  • , Martin Kaltschmitt
  • , Sören Ehlers
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • German Aerospace Center
  • Hamburg University of Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Hydrogen, in its various storage forms, represents a potential fuel for climate-neutral shipping. In order to evaluate the safety of bunkering liquid hydrogen and to establish a basis for a comparison with the bunkering of LNG, a quantitative risk assessment has been conducted. This paper continues this work, by first realizing a quantitative risk assessment (QRA) with adopted systems allowing for the same bunkering duration for both fuels. The investigation shows that the diameter of the pipe has a significant impact on the frequency of hazardous events. To gain a deeper understanding of the effect, a sensitivity analysis is conducted. In addition to the frequencies, a notable impact of the pipe diameter can also be observed with regards to the safety distance in the full rupture case. Furthermore, the safety distances are found to be significantly impacted by wind speed and release time. The ambient temperature and humidity are identified to have only a minor impact.

Original languageEnglish
Article number153196
JournalInternational Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Volume205
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jan 2026
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Bunkering
  • Hydrogen
  • LNG
  • QRA
  • Safety
  • Shipping

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing the safety of bunkering LH2 and LNG using quantitative risk assessment with a focus on ignition hazards—Sensitivity analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this