TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus-Based Core Set of Outcome Measures for Clinical Motor Rehabilitation After Stroke—A Delphi Study
AU - Pohl, Johannes
AU - Held, Jeremia Philipp Oskar
AU - Verheyden, Geert
AU - Alt Murphy, Margit
AU - Engelter, Stefan
AU - Flöel, Agnes
AU - Keller, Thierry
AU - Kwakkel, Gert
AU - Nef, Tobias
AU - Ward, Nick
AU - Luft, Andreas Rüdiger
AU - Veerbeek, Janne Marieke
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Copyright © 2020 Pohl, Held, Verheyden, Alt Murphy, Engelter, Flöel, Keller, Kwakkel, Nef, Ward, Luft and Veerbeek.
PY - 2020/9/2
Y1 - 2020/9/2
N2 - Introduction: Outcome measures are key to tailor rehabilitation goals to the stroke patient’s individual needs and to monitor poststroke recovery. The large number of available outcome measures leads to high variability in clinical use. Currently, an internationally agreed core set of motor outcome measures for clinical application is lacking. Therefore, the goal was to develop such a set to serve as a quality standard in clinical motor rehabilitation poststroke. Methods: Outcome measures for the upper and lower extremities, and activities of daily living (ADL)/stroke-specific outcomes were identified and presented to stroke rehabilitation experts in an electronic Delphi study. In round 1, clinical feasibility and relevance of the outcome measures were rated on a 7-point Likert scale. In round 2, those rated at least as “relevant” and “feasible” were ranked within the body functions, activities, and participation domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Furthermore, measurement time points poststroke were indicated. In round 3, answers were reviewed in reference to overall results to reach final consensus.
AB - Introduction: Outcome measures are key to tailor rehabilitation goals to the stroke patient’s individual needs and to monitor poststroke recovery. The large number of available outcome measures leads to high variability in clinical use. Currently, an internationally agreed core set of motor outcome measures for clinical application is lacking. Therefore, the goal was to develop such a set to serve as a quality standard in clinical motor rehabilitation poststroke. Methods: Outcome measures for the upper and lower extremities, and activities of daily living (ADL)/stroke-specific outcomes were identified and presented to stroke rehabilitation experts in an electronic Delphi study. In round 1, clinical feasibility and relevance of the outcome measures were rated on a 7-point Likert scale. In round 2, those rated at least as “relevant” and “feasible” were ranked within the body functions, activities, and participation domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Furthermore, measurement time points poststroke were indicated. In round 3, answers were reviewed in reference to overall results to reach final consensus.
KW - Stroke
KW - Motor rehabilitation
KW - Clinical
KW - Outcome measures
KW - Delphi study
KW - Stroke
KW - Motor rehabilitation
KW - Clinical
KW - Outcome measures
KW - Delphi study
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091027968&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3389/fneur.2020.00875
DO - 10.3389/fneur.2020.00875
M3 - Article
SN - 1664-2295
VL - 11
SP - 875
JO - Frontiers in Neurology
JF - Frontiers in Neurology
M1 - 875
ER -