Correction to: Are the existing eu ecolabel criteria for furniture products too complex? An analysis of complexity from a material and a supply chain perspective and suggestions for ways ahead (The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, (2020), 25, 5, (868-882), 10.1007/s11367-019-01601-1)

Shane Donatello; Mauro Cordella; Renata Kaps; Malgorzata Kowalska; Oliver Wolf

doi:10.1007/s11367-021-01948-4

Correction to: Are the existing eu ecolabel criteria for furniture products too complex? An analysis of complexity from a material and a supply chain perspective and suggestions for ways ahead (The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, (2020), 25, 5, (868-882), 10.1007/s11367-019-01601-1)

Shane Donatello^*
, Mauro Cordella
, Renata Kaps
, Malgorzata Kowalska
, Oliver Wolf

^*Corresponding author for this work

European Commission Joint Research Centre (JRC)

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

The article “Are the existing EU Ecolabel criteria for furniture products too complex? An analysis of complexity from a material and a supply chain perspective and suggestions for ways ahead”, written by Shane Donatello, Mauro Cordella, Renata Kaps, Malgorzata Kowalska1 & Oliver Wolf1, was originally published Online First without Open Access. After publication in volume, issue, page the author decided to opt for Open Choice and to make the article an Open Access publication.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	2103
Number of pages	1
Journal	International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
Volume	26
Issue number	10
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01948-4
Publication status	Published - Oct 2021
Externally published	Yes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

Access to Document

10.1007/s11367-021-01948-4

Correction to Are the existing eu ecolabelFinal published version, 350 KB

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: Are the existing eu ecolabel criteria for furniture products too complex? An analysis of complexity from a material and a supply chain perspective and suggestions for ways ahead (The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, (2020), 25, 5, (868-882), 10.1007/s11367-019-01601-1)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Donatello, S., Cordella, M., Kaps, R., Kowalska, M., & Wolf, O. (2021). Correction to: Are the existing eu ecolabel criteria for furniture products too complex? An analysis of complexity from a material and a supply chain perspective and suggestions for ways ahead (The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, (2020), 25, 5, (868-882), 10.1007/s11367-019-01601-1). International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 26(10), 2103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01948-4

Donatello, Shane ; Cordella, Mauro ; Kaps, Renata et al. / Correction to : Are the existing eu ecolabel criteria for furniture products too complex? An analysis of complexity from a material and a supply chain perspective and suggestions for ways ahead (The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, (2020), 25, 5, (868-882), 10.1007/s11367-019-01601-1). In: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2021 ; Vol. 26, No. 10. pp. 2103.

@article{a1ae11b5e6e0457db78c428c4b2909ec,

title = "Correction to: Are the existing eu ecolabel criteria for furniture products too complex? An analysis of complexity from a material and a supply chain perspective and suggestions for ways ahead (The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, (2020), 25, 5, (868-882), 10.1007/s11367-019-01601-1)",

abstract = "The article “Are the existing EU Ecolabel criteria for furniture products too complex? An analysis of complexity from a material and a supply chain perspective and suggestions for ways ahead”, written by Shane Donatello, Mauro Cordella, Renata Kaps, Malgorzata Kowalska1 \& Oliver Wolf1, was originally published Online First without Open Access. After publication in volume, issue, page the author decided to opt for Open Choice and to make the article an Open Access publication.",

author = "Shane Donatello and Mauro Cordella and Renata Kaps and Malgorzata Kowalska and Oliver Wolf",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2021.",

year = "2021",

month = oct,

doi = "10.1007/s11367-021-01948-4",

language = "English",

volume = "26",

pages = "2103",

journal = "International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment",

issn = "0948-3349",

publisher = "Springer Science + Business Media",

number = "10",

}

Donatello, S, Cordella, M, Kaps, R, Kowalska, M & Wolf, O 2021, 'Correction to: Are the existing eu ecolabel criteria for furniture products too complex? An analysis of complexity from a material and a supply chain perspective and suggestions for ways ahead (The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, (2020), 25, 5, (868-882), 10.1007/s11367-019-01601-1)', International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 2103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-021-01948-4

Correction to: Are the existing eu ecolabel criteria for furniture products too complex? An analysis of complexity from a material and a supply chain perspective and suggestions for ways ahead (The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, (2020), 25, 5, (868-882), 10.1007/s11367-019-01601-1). / Donatello, Shane; Cordella, Mauro; Kaps, Renata et al.
In: International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, Vol. 26, No. 10, 10.2021, p. 2103.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction to

T2 - Are the existing eu ecolabel criteria for furniture products too complex? An analysis of complexity from a material and a supply chain perspective and suggestions for ways ahead (The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, (2020), 25, 5, (868-882), 10.1007/s11367-019-01601-1)

AU - Donatello, Shane

AU - Cordella, Mauro

AU - Kaps, Renata

AU - Kowalska, Malgorzata

AU - Wolf, Oliver

PY - 2021/10

Y1 - 2021/10

N2 - The article “Are the existing EU Ecolabel criteria for furniture products too complex? An analysis of complexity from a material and a supply chain perspective and suggestions for ways ahead”, written by Shane Donatello, Mauro Cordella, Renata Kaps, Malgorzata Kowalska1 & Oliver Wolf1, was originally published Online First without Open Access. After publication in volume, issue, page the author decided to opt for Open Choice and to make the article an Open Access publication.

AB - The article “Are the existing EU Ecolabel criteria for furniture products too complex? An analysis of complexity from a material and a supply chain perspective and suggestions for ways ahead”, written by Shane Donatello, Mauro Cordella, Renata Kaps, Malgorzata Kowalska1 & Oliver Wolf1, was originally published Online First without Open Access. After publication in volume, issue, page the author decided to opt for Open Choice and to make the article an Open Access publication.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85116573411

U2 - 10.1007/s11367-021-01948-4

DO - 10.1007/s11367-021-01948-4

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85116573411

SN - 0948-3349

VL - 26

SP - 2103

JO - International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

JF - International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment

IS - 10

ER -

Donatello S, Cordella M, Kaps R, Kowalska M, Wolf O. Correction to: Are the existing eu ecolabel criteria for furniture products too complex? An analysis of complexity from a material and a supply chain perspective and suggestions for ways ahead (The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, (2020), 25, 5, (868-882), 10.1007/s11367-019-01601-1). International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 2021 Oct;26(10):2103. doi: 10.1007/s11367-021-01948-4

Correction to: Are the existing eu ecolabel criteria for furniture products too complex? An analysis of complexity from a material and a supply chain perspective and suggestions for ways ahead (The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, (2020), 25, 5, (868-882), 10.1007/s11367-019-01601-1)

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this