Abstract
Invar, also known as FeNi36, is a material of great interest due to its unique properties, which makes it an excellent alterna tive for sectors such as tooling in aeronautics and aerospace. Its manufacture by means of wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) technology could extend its use. This paper aims to evaluate the comparison of two of the most widespread WAAM technologies: plasma arc welding (PAW) and gas metal arc welding (GMAW). This comparison is based on the analysis of wall geometry, metallography, and mechanical properties of the material produced by both technologies. The results show a slight increase in toughness and elongation before fracture and worse tensile strength data in the case of PAW, with aver age values of 485 MPa for ultimate tensile strength (UTS), 31% for elongation and 475 MPa, 40% in GMAW and PAW, respectively. All results gathered from the analysis show the possibility of successful manufacturing of Invar by means of WAAM technologies. The novelties presented in this paper allow us to establish relationships between the thermal input of the process itself and the mechanical and metallographic properties of the material produced.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1081-1091 |
Number of pages | 11 |
Journal | Welding in the World |
Volume | 66 |
Issue number | 6 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 7 Apr 2022 |
Keywords
- Nickel-based alloys
- Direct energy deposition
- WAAM
- Additive manufacturing
- FeNi36
Project and Funding Information
- Project ID
- info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/ID 20094/EU/DEDALUS
- Funding Info
- Open Access funding provided by Universidad Pública de Navarra. _x000D_ The authors acknowledge funding from the Basque Govern ment to the HARITIVE project [ZE-2017/00038], HARIPLUS project [ZE-2019/00352], QUALYFAM project [kk-2020/00042],_x000D_ and the European Institute of Innovation and Technology to DEDALUS project [reference ID 20094]