TY - GEN
T1 - Experiences in introducing noise management processes
T2 - 4th European Congress on Acustics, Forum Acusticum 2005
AU - Aspuru, Itziar
AU - Vázquez, Manuel
AU - Fernández, Pilar
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - Different Authorities are introducing the Noise Management concept as an integrated process that helps to develop activities on assessment, prevention, correction, public information and participation. On that sense they try to involve on this process to spatial and noise source managers. This paper refers to experiences leaded by different authorities, and analyses three subjects. Firstly, it shows problems and practices when different departments and authorities are required to take part in the process. Secondly, it exposes the aspects to be taken into account in each case to adapt the process and the system that supports it. Surely, there will be some particularities on the approach done by authorities according to their needs and priorities, to the situation to be managed, to the administrative structure, or to the availability and quality of input data. The noise management process should adapt to each situation. This will lead into particularities on the scope of the process, on the actors involved, on the system that could support it, and on the technical methodology applied. Finally, the paper analyses two specific Noise Mapping implementations, applying the Good Practice Guide published by WG-AEN. It assesses and compares the input data used in each case and the methodologies applied to answer to the END. The paper is based on the experience of Labein introducing Noise Management System in different Spanish authorities and, in particular, on two projects done for the Environment Departments of Diputación Foral de Bizkaia Provincial Authority) and Gobierno Vasco (Regional Authority).
AB - Different Authorities are introducing the Noise Management concept as an integrated process that helps to develop activities on assessment, prevention, correction, public information and participation. On that sense they try to involve on this process to spatial and noise source managers. This paper refers to experiences leaded by different authorities, and analyses three subjects. Firstly, it shows problems and practices when different departments and authorities are required to take part in the process. Secondly, it exposes the aspects to be taken into account in each case to adapt the process and the system that supports it. Surely, there will be some particularities on the approach done by authorities according to their needs and priorities, to the situation to be managed, to the administrative structure, or to the availability and quality of input data. The noise management process should adapt to each situation. This will lead into particularities on the scope of the process, on the actors involved, on the system that could support it, and on the technical methodology applied. Finally, the paper analyses two specific Noise Mapping implementations, applying the Good Practice Guide published by WG-AEN. It assesses and compares the input data used in each case and the methodologies applied to answer to the END. The paper is based on the experience of Labein introducing Noise Management System in different Spanish authorities and, in particular, on two projects done for the Environment Departments of Diputación Foral de Bizkaia Provincial Authority) and Gobierno Vasco (Regional Authority).
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84864627981&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84864627981
SN - 9638241683
SN - 9789638241689
T3 - Forum Acusticum Budapest 2005: 4th European Congress on Acustics
SP - 1045
EP - 1050
BT - Forum Acusticum Budapest 2005
Y2 - 29 August 2005 through 2 September 2005
ER -