TY - GEN
T1 - Head and eye movements influence the decoding of different reaching directions from EEG
AU - Bibian, Carlos
AU - Lopez-Larraz, Eduardo
AU - Ramos-Murguialday, Ander
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 IEEE.
PY - 2019/5/16
Y1 - 2019/5/16
N2 - Electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain-machine interfaces (BMI) have been proven effective for motor rehabilitation of severely paralyzed patients. The brain activity is classified and translated into a go vs no-go feedback (i.e., mobilizing, or not, the paralyzed limb). Patients performing the same movements but unrelated to their brain activity showed poorer or no recovery, which suggests that an accurate feedback expedites motor recovery. Being able to decode different movements from the EEG would allow providing a more accurate feedback, maximizing the rehabilitative potential. However, a dynamic rehabilitative environment with different types of movements would likely be accompanied by involuntary motions with the eyes and the head, which can contaminate the measured EEG signals. In this study we analyze how external movements associated with the task (i.e., eye or head movements) influence the performance of an EEG-based decoder of reaching movements. Our results reveal that different reaching directions could only be decoded when eye and head movements occur and only using low frequency features (delta band). In summary, this paper highlights the importance of carefully designing protocols to avoid eye and head movements to contaminate EEG signals.
AB - Electroencephalography (EEG)-based brain-machine interfaces (BMI) have been proven effective for motor rehabilitation of severely paralyzed patients. The brain activity is classified and translated into a go vs no-go feedback (i.e., mobilizing, or not, the paralyzed limb). Patients performing the same movements but unrelated to their brain activity showed poorer or no recovery, which suggests that an accurate feedback expedites motor recovery. Being able to decode different movements from the EEG would allow providing a more accurate feedback, maximizing the rehabilitative potential. However, a dynamic rehabilitative environment with different types of movements would likely be accompanied by involuntary motions with the eyes and the head, which can contaminate the measured EEG signals. In this study we analyze how external movements associated with the task (i.e., eye or head movements) influence the performance of an EEG-based decoder of reaching movements. Our results reveal that different reaching directions could only be decoded when eye and head movements occur and only using low frequency features (delta band). In summary, this paper highlights the importance of carefully designing protocols to avoid eye and head movements to contaminate EEG signals.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85066764140
U2 - 10.1109/NER.2019.8717012
DO - 10.1109/NER.2019.8717012
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85066764140
T3 - International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, NER
SP - 1204
EP - 1207
BT - 9th International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, NER 2019
PB - IEEE Computer Society
T2 - 9th International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering, NER 2019
Y2 - 20 March 2019 through 23 March 2019
ER -