TY - JOUR
T1 - Improving the Resilience of Historic Areas Coping with Natural and Climate Change Hazards
T2 - Interventions Based on Multi-Criteria Methodology
AU - Briz, Estibaliz
AU - Garmendia, Leire
AU - Marcos, Ignacio
AU - Gandini, Alessandra
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s). Published with license by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Cultural and Natural Heritage (CNH), a legacy bequeathed to present and future generations, casts light on the humanity of past generations. However, the increase and the intensity of natural and climate-change-related hazards threaten the conservation of such heritage. The aim of this research is to develop a multi-criteria prioritization methodology in support of intervention decisions, to enhance the resilience of CNH conservation through sustainable development. The application of two methods, the Integrated Value Model for Sustainability Assessment and the Analytical Hierarchy Process, ensures both the contribution of a wide panel of experts of heritage conservation and equitable indicator assessment measured on different scales. The prioritization methodology has been developed considering the most common hazards and specific disaster-risk scenarios. The three dimensions of sustainable development and both technical and cultural dimensions are also considered in the methodology. All dimensions and their indicators are weighted to produce a Prioritization Index to support decision-making.
AB - Cultural and Natural Heritage (CNH), a legacy bequeathed to present and future generations, casts light on the humanity of past generations. However, the increase and the intensity of natural and climate-change-related hazards threaten the conservation of such heritage. The aim of this research is to develop a multi-criteria prioritization methodology in support of intervention decisions, to enhance the resilience of CNH conservation through sustainable development. The application of two methods, the Integrated Value Model for Sustainability Assessment and the Analytical Hierarchy Process, ensures both the contribution of a wide panel of experts of heritage conservation and equitable indicator assessment measured on different scales. The prioritization methodology has been developed considering the most common hazards and specific disaster-risk scenarios. The three dimensions of sustainable development and both technical and cultural dimensions are also considered in the methodology. All dimensions and their indicators are weighted to produce a Prioritization Index to support decision-making.
KW - Adaptive solutions
KW - heritage conservation
KW - natural disaster risk
KW - resilience enhancement
KW - sustainable prioritization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85162724080&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/15583058.2023.2218311
DO - 10.1080/15583058.2023.2218311
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85162724080
SN - 1558-3058
VL - 18
SP - 1235
EP - 1262
JO - International Journal of Architectural Heritage
JF - International Journal of Architectural Heritage
IS - 8
ER -