TY - JOUR
T1 - Is EMG a Viable Alternative to BCI for Detecting Movement Intention in Severe Stroke?
AU - Balasubramanian, Sivakumar
AU - Garcia-Cossio, Eliana
AU - Birbaumer, Niels
AU - Burdet, Etienne
AU - Ramos-Murguialday, Ander
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 IEEE.
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - Objective: In light of the shortcomings of current restorative brain-computer interfaces (BCI), this study investigated the possibility of using EMG to detect hand/wrist extension movement intention to trigger robot-assisted training in individuals without residual movements. Methods: We compared movement intention detection using an EMG detector with a sensorimotor rhythm based EEG-BCI using only ipsilesional activity. This was carried out on data of 30 severely affected chronic stroke patients from a randomized control trial using an EEG-BCI for robot-assisted training. Results: The results indicate the feasibility of using EMG to detect movement intention in this severely handicapped population; probability of detecting EMG when patients attempted to move was higher (p < 0.001) than at rest. Interestingly, 22 out of 30 (or 73%) patients had sufficiently strong EMG in their finger/wrist extensors. Furthermore, in patients with detectable EMG, there was poor agreement between the EEG and EMG intent detectors, which indicates that these modalities may detect different processes. Conclusion : A substantial segment of severely affected stroke patients may benefit from EMG-based assisted therapy. When compared to EEG, a surface EMG interface requires less preparation time, which is easier to don/doff, and is more compact in size. Significance: This study shows that a large proportion of severely affected stroke patients have residual EMG, which yields a direct and practical way to trigger robot-assisted training.
AB - Objective: In light of the shortcomings of current restorative brain-computer interfaces (BCI), this study investigated the possibility of using EMG to detect hand/wrist extension movement intention to trigger robot-assisted training in individuals without residual movements. Methods: We compared movement intention detection using an EMG detector with a sensorimotor rhythm based EEG-BCI using only ipsilesional activity. This was carried out on data of 30 severely affected chronic stroke patients from a randomized control trial using an EEG-BCI for robot-assisted training. Results: The results indicate the feasibility of using EMG to detect movement intention in this severely handicapped population; probability of detecting EMG when patients attempted to move was higher (p < 0.001) than at rest. Interestingly, 22 out of 30 (or 73%) patients had sufficiently strong EMG in their finger/wrist extensors. Furthermore, in patients with detectable EMG, there was poor agreement between the EEG and EMG intent detectors, which indicates that these modalities may detect different processes. Conclusion : A substantial segment of severely affected stroke patients may benefit from EMG-based assisted therapy. When compared to EEG, a surface EMG interface requires less preparation time, which is easier to don/doff, and is more compact in size. Significance: This study shows that a large proportion of severely affected stroke patients have residual EMG, which yields a direct and practical way to trigger robot-assisted training.
KW - BCI
KW - EMG
KW - Stroke
KW - movement intention
KW - neurorehabilitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044258145&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TBME.2018.2817688
DO - 10.1109/TBME.2018.2817688
M3 - Article
C2 - 29993449
AN - SCOPUS:85044258145
SN - 0018-9294
VL - 65
SP - 2790
EP - 2797
JO - IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
JF - IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering
IS - 12
M1 - 8320831
ER -