Making Software Safety Assessable and Transparent

Risto Nevalainen, Alejandra Ruiz, Timo Varkoi

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

Most formal assessment and evaluation techniques and standards assume that software can be analysed like any physical item. In safety-critical systems, software is an important component providing functionality. Often it is also the most difficult component to assess. Balanced use of process assessment and product evaluation methods is needed, because lack of transparency in software must be compensated with a more formal development process. Safety case is an effective approach to demonstrate safety, and then both process and product are necessary evidence types. Safety is also a likely candidate to be approached as a process quality characteristic. Here we present a tentative set of process quality attributes that support achievement of safety requirements of a software product.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSystems, Software and Services Process Improvement - 20th European Conference, EuroSPI 2013, Proceedings
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages1-12
Number of pages12
ISBN (Print)9783642391781
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2013
Event20th European Conference on System and Software Process Improvement, EuroSPI 2013 - Dundalk, Ireland
Duration: 25 Jun 201327 Jun 2013

Publication series

NameCommunications in Computer and Information Science
Volume364 CCIS
ISSN (Print)1865-0929

Conference

Conference20th European Conference on System and Software Process Improvement, EuroSPI 2013
Country/TerritoryIreland
CityDundalk
Period25/06/1327/06/13

Keywords

  • process assessment
  • software process
  • software safety

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Making Software Safety Assessable and Transparent'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this