Abstract
The problem of molecular docking focuses on minimizing the binding energy of a complex composed by a ligand and a receptor. In this paper, we propose a new approach based on the joint optimization of three conflicting objectives: Einter that relates to the ligand-receptor affinity, the Eintra characterizing the ligand deformity and the RMSD score (Root Mean Square Deviation), which measures the difference of atomic distances between the co-crystallized ligand and the computed ligand. In order to deal with this multi-objective problem, three different metaheuristic solvers (SMPSO, MOEA/D and MPSO/D) are used to evolve a numerical representation of the ligand’s conformation. An experimental benchmark is designed to shed light on the comparative performance of these multi-objective heuristics, comprising a set of HIV-proteases/inhibitors complexes where flexibility was applied. The obtained results are promising, and pave the way towards embracing the proposed algorithms for practical multi-criteria in the docking problem.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Studies in Computational Intelligence |
| Publisher | Springer Verlag |
| Pages | 369-379 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Publication series
| Name | Studies in Computational Intelligence |
|---|---|
| Volume | 798 |
| ISSN (Print) | 1860-949X |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Flexibility modeling
- MOEA/D
- Molecular docking
- MPSO/D
- Multi-objective optimization
- SMPSO
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver