Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Neuroimaging in Functional Neurological Disorder: State of the Field and Research Agenda

  • David L. Perez*
  • , Timothy R. Nicholson
  • , Ali A. Asadi-Pooya
  • , Indrit Bègue
  • , Matthew Butler
  • , Alan J. Carson
  • , Anthony S. David
  • , Quinton Deeley
  • , Ibai Diez
  • , Mark J. Edwards
  • , Alberto J. Espay
  • , Jeannette M. Gelauff
  • , Mark Hallett
  • , Silvina G. Horovitz
  • , Johannes Jungilligens
  • , Richard A.A. Kanaan
  • , Marina A.J. Tijssen
  • , Kasia Kozlowska
  • , Kathrin LaFaver
  • , W. Curt LaFrance
  • Sarah C. Lidstone, Ramesh S. Marapin, Carine W. Maurer, Mandana Modirrousta, Antje A.T.S. Reinders, Petr Sojka, Jeffrey P. Staab, Jon Stone, Jerzy P. Szaflarski, Selma Aybek
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Harvard University
  • King's College London
  • Shiraz University of Medical Sciences
  • University of Geneva
  • University of Edinburgh
  • University College London
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • St George's University of London
  • University of Cincinnati
  • Amsterdam UMC - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Ruhr University Bochum
  • University of Melbourne
  • University of Groningen
  • University of Sydney
  • Northwestern University
  • Brown University
  • University Health Network
  • Stony Brook University
  • University of Manitoba
  • Masaryk University
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • University of Bern

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

168 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Functional neurological disorder (FND) was of great interest to early clinical neuroscience leaders. During the 20th century, neurology and psychiatry grew apart – leaving FND a borderland condition. Fortunately, a renaissance has occurred in the last two decades, fostered by increased recognition that FND is prevalent and diagnosed using “rule-in” examination signs. The parallel use of scientific tools to bridge brain structure - function relationships has helped refine an integrated biopsychosocial framework through which to conceptualize FND. In particular, a growing number of quality neuroimaging studies using a variety of methodologies have shed light on the emerging pathophysiology of FND. This renewed scientific interest has occurred in parallel with enhanced interdisciplinary collaborations, as illustrated by new care models combining psychological and physical therapies and the creation of a new multidisciplinary FND society supporting knowledge dissemination in the field. Within this context, this article summarizes the output of the first International FND Neuroimaging Workgroup meeting, held virtually, on June 17th, 2020 to appraise the state of neuroimaging research in the field and to catalyze large-scale collaborations. We first briefly summarize neural circuit models of FND, and then detail the research approaches used to date in FND within core content areas: cohort characterization; control group considerations; task-based functional neuroimaging; resting-state networks; structural neuroimaging; biomarkers of symptom severity and risk of illness; and predictors of treatment response and prognosis. Lastly, we outline a neuroimaging-focused research agenda to elucidate the pathophysiology of FND and aid the development of novel biologically and psychologically-informed treatments.

Original languageEnglish
Article number102623
JournalNeuroImage: Clinical
Volume30
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Conversion disorder
  • DTI
  • Functional neurological disorder
  • MRI
  • Neuroimaging
  • fMRI

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Neuroimaging in Functional Neurological Disorder: State of the Field and Research Agenda'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this