TY - JOUR
T1 - OC6 Phase II: Integration and verification of a new soil–structure interaction model for offshore wind design
T2 - Integration and verification of a new soil–structure interaction model for offshore wind design
AU - Bergua, Roger
AU - Robertson, Amy
AU - Jonkman, Jason
AU - Platt, Andy
AU - Page, Ana
AU - Qvist, Jacob
AU - Amet, Ervin
AU - Cai, Zhisong
AU - Han, Huali
AU - Beardsell, Alec
AU - Shi, Wei
AU - Galván, Josean
AU - Bachynski‐Polić, Erin
AU - McKinnon, Gill
AU - Harnois, Violette
AU - Bonnet, Paul
AU - Suja‐Thauvin, Loup
AU - Hansen, Anders Melchior
AU - Mendikoa Alonso, Iñigo
AU - Aristondo, Ander
AU - Battistella, Tommaso
AU - Guanche, Raúl
AU - Schünemann, Paul
AU - Pham, Thanh‐Dam
AU - Trubat, Pau
AU - Alarcón, Daniel
AU - Haudin, Florence
AU - Nguyen, Minh Quan
AU - Goveas, Akhilesh
AU - Bachynski-Polić, Erin
AU - Suja-Thauvin, Loup
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Norwegian Geotechnical Institute (NGI). This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
PY - 2022/5
Y1 - 2022/5
N2 - This paper provides a summary of the work done within the OC6 Phase II project, which was focused on the implementation and verification of an advanced soil–structure interaction model for offshore wind system design and analysis. The soil–structure interaction model comes from the REDWIN project and uses an elastoplastic, macroelement model with kinematic hardening, which captures the stiffness and damping characteristics of offshore wind foundations more accurately than more traditional and simplified soil–structure interaction modeling approaches. Participants in the OC6 project integrated this macroelement capability to coupled aero-hydro-servo-elastic offshore wind turbine modeling tools and verified the implementation by comparing simulation results across the modeling tools for an example monopile design. The simulation results were also compared to more traditional soil–structure interaction modeling approaches like apparent fixity, coupled springs, and distributed springs models. The macroelement approach resulted in smaller overall loading in the system due to both shifts in the system frequencies and increased energy dissipation. No validation work was performed, but the macroelement approach has shown increased accuracy within the REDWIN project, resulting in decreased uncertainty in the design. For the monopile design investigated here, that implies a less conservative and thus more cost-effective offshore wind design.
AB - This paper provides a summary of the work done within the OC6 Phase II project, which was focused on the implementation and verification of an advanced soil–structure interaction model for offshore wind system design and analysis. The soil–structure interaction model comes from the REDWIN project and uses an elastoplastic, macroelement model with kinematic hardening, which captures the stiffness and damping characteristics of offshore wind foundations more accurately than more traditional and simplified soil–structure interaction modeling approaches. Participants in the OC6 project integrated this macroelement capability to coupled aero-hydro-servo-elastic offshore wind turbine modeling tools and verified the implementation by comparing simulation results across the modeling tools for an example monopile design. The simulation results were also compared to more traditional soil–structure interaction modeling approaches like apparent fixity, coupled springs, and distributed springs models. The macroelement approach resulted in smaller overall loading in the system due to both shifts in the system frequencies and increased energy dissipation. No validation work was performed, but the macroelement approach has shown increased accuracy within the REDWIN project, resulting in decreased uncertainty in the design. For the monopile design investigated here, that implies a less conservative and thus more cost-effective offshore wind design.
KW - Hysteretic damping
KW - Macroelement
KW - Monopile
KW - OC6
KW - Offshore wind
KW - Soil–structure interaction
KW - Hysteretic damping
KW - Macroelement
KW - Monopile
KW - OC6
KW - Offshore wind
KW - Soil–structure interaction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85121368926&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/we.2698
DO - 10.1002/we.2698
M3 - Article
SN - 1095-4244
VL - 25
SP - 793
EP - 810
JO - Wind Energy
JF - Wind Energy
IS - 5
ER -