TY - JOUR
T1 - Ocean Energy Systems Wave Energy Modelling Task: Modelling, Verification and Validation of Wave Energy Converters
T2 - Modelling, verification and validation ofwave energy converters
AU - Wendt, Fabian
AU - Nielsen, Kim
AU - Yu, Yi-Hsiang
AU - Bingham, Harry
AU - Eskilsson, Claes
AU - Kramer, Morten
AU - Babarit, Aurelien
AU - Bunnik, Tim
AU - Costello, Ronan
AU - Crowley, Sarah
AU - Gendron, Bengamin
AU - Giorgi, Giuseppe
AU - Girardin, Samuel
AU - Greaves, Devorah
AU - Heras, Pilar
AU - Hoffman, Johan
AU - Islam, Hafizul
AU - Jakobsen, Ken-Robert
AU - Janson, Carl-Erik
AU - Jansson, Johan
AU - Kim, Hyun Yul
AU - Kurniawan, Adi
AU - Leoni, Massimiliano
AU - Mathai, Thomas
AU - Nam, Bo-Woo
AU - Park, Sewan
AU - Rajagopalan, Krishnakumar
AU - Ransley, Edward
AU - Read, Robert
AU - Ringwood, John V.
AU - Rodrigues, Jose Miguel
AU - Rosenthal, Benjamin
AU - Roy, Andre
AU - Ruehl, Kelley
AU - Schofield, Paul
AU - Sheng, Wanan
AU - Shiri, Abolfazl
AU - Thomas, Sarah
AU - Touzon, Imanol
AU - Yasutaka, Imai
AU - Giorgi, Simone
AU - Kim, Jeong-Seok
AU - Kim, Kyong-Hwan
AU - Gendron, Benjamin
AU - Greaves, Deborah
AU - Schofield, Paul
N1 - The Danish partners acknowledge the support from the Danish Energy Agency through project 374 64017-05197. The Swedish partners were supported by the Swedish Energy Agency under Grants P44423-1 and 375 P44432-1. J.V.R. and G.G. acknowledge the support by Science Foundation Ireland under Grant 13/IA/1886. This research was made possible by support from U.S. the Department of Energy’s EERE Water Power Technologies Office. Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-mission laboratory managed and operated by National Technology and Engineering Solutions of Sandia, LLC., a wholly owned subsidiary of Honeywell International, Inc., for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE-NA0003525. This work was authored (in part) by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308. Funding was provided by the U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Wind Energy Technologies Office. The views expressed in this article do not necessarily represent the views of the DOE or the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledge that the U.S. Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this work, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - The International Energy Agency Technology Collaboration Programme for Ocean Energy Systems (OES) initiated the OES Wave Energy Conversion Modelling Task, which focused on the verification and validation of numerical models for simulating wave energy converters (WECs). The long-term goal is to assess the accuracy of and establish confidence in the use of numerical models used in design as well as power performance assessment of WECs. To establish this confidence, the authors used different existing computational modelling tools to simulate given tasks to identify uncertainties related to simulation methodologies: (i) linear potential flow methods; (ii) weakly nonlinear Froude–Krylov methods; and (iii) fully nonlinear methods (fully nonlinear potential flow and Navier–Stokes models). This article summarizes the code-to-code task and code-to-experiment task that have been performed so far in this project, with a focus on investigating the impact of different levels of nonlinearities in the numerical models. Two different WECs were studied and simulated. The first was a heaving semi-submerged sphere, where free-decay tests and both regular and irregular wave cases were investigated in a code-to-code comparison. The second case was a heaving float corresponding to a physical model tested in a wave tank. We considered radiation, diffraction, and regular wave cases and compared quantities, such as the WEC motion, power output and hydrodynamic loading.
AB - The International Energy Agency Technology Collaboration Programme for Ocean Energy Systems (OES) initiated the OES Wave Energy Conversion Modelling Task, which focused on the verification and validation of numerical models for simulating wave energy converters (WECs). The long-term goal is to assess the accuracy of and establish confidence in the use of numerical models used in design as well as power performance assessment of WECs. To establish this confidence, the authors used different existing computational modelling tools to simulate given tasks to identify uncertainties related to simulation methodologies: (i) linear potential flow methods; (ii) weakly nonlinear Froude–Krylov methods; and (iii) fully nonlinear methods (fully nonlinear potential flow and Navier–Stokes models). This article summarizes the code-to-code task and code-to-experiment task that have been performed so far in this project, with a focus on investigating the impact of different levels of nonlinearities in the numerical models. Two different WECs were studied and simulated. The first was a heaving semi-submerged sphere, where free-decay tests and both regular and irregular wave cases were investigated in a code-to-code comparison. The second case was a heaving float corresponding to a physical model tested in a wave tank. We considered radiation, diffraction, and regular wave cases and compared quantities, such as the WEC motion, power output and hydrodynamic loading.
KW - Wave energy
KW - Numerical modelling
KW - Simulation
KW - Boundary element method
KW - Computational fluid dynamics
KW - Wave energy
KW - Numerical modelling
KW - Simulation
KW - Boundary element method
KW - Computational fluid dynamics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075672461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/jmse7110379
DO - 10.3390/jmse7110379
M3 - Article
SN - 2077-1312
VL - 7
SP - 379
JO - Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
JF - Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
IS - 11
M1 - 379
ER -