TY - JOUR
T1 - On the Capability of Cascaded H-Bridge Converter-Based Energy Systems to Tolerate Intraphase Active Power Imbalance
AU - Nunes, Enrique
AU - Liang, Gaowen
AU - Rodriguez, Ezequiel
AU - Farivar, Glen G.
AU - Konstantinou, Georgios
AU - Ghias, Amer M.Y.M.
AU - Ceballos, Salvador
AU - Pou, Josep
AU - Franquelo, Leopoldo G.
AU - Rodriguez, Jose
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 IEEE.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - The cascaded H-bridge (CHB) converter is an attractive topology to interface energy sources, such as battery energy storage or photovoltaic systems, with the medium-voltage grid. The submodules in CHB converter-based energy systems unavoidably process different active power during operation. However, there exist inherent limits that prohibit an arbitrarily imbalanced intraphase active power distribution. Failing to consider such limits can result in output current distortion and capacitor voltage deviation, which can jeopardize the CHB converter. Crucially, these limits vary depending on the modulation method utilized, whose selection is, thus, of utmost relevance. Accordingly, this article derives and compares the feasible intraphase active power imbalance range of existing modulation methods. The analysis is experimentally corroborated in a 1-kVA single-phase CHB converter with six submodules per phase. Based on the comparison, suggestions on which modulation methods are preferred for different CHB applications are provided.
AB - The cascaded H-bridge (CHB) converter is an attractive topology to interface energy sources, such as battery energy storage or photovoltaic systems, with the medium-voltage grid. The submodules in CHB converter-based energy systems unavoidably process different active power during operation. However, there exist inherent limits that prohibit an arbitrarily imbalanced intraphase active power distribution. Failing to consider such limits can result in output current distortion and capacitor voltage deviation, which can jeopardize the CHB converter. Crucially, these limits vary depending on the modulation method utilized, whose selection is, thus, of utmost relevance. Accordingly, this article derives and compares the feasible intraphase active power imbalance range of existing modulation methods. The analysis is experimentally corroborated in a 1-kVA single-phase CHB converter with six submodules per phase. Based on the comparison, suggestions on which modulation methods are preferred for different CHB applications are provided.
KW - Battery energy storage systems (BESSs)
KW - cascaded H-bridge (CHB) converter
KW - modulation
KW - photovoltaic (PV) systems
KW - power imbalance tolerance
KW - renewable energy sources
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105022779878
U2 - 10.1109/OJIES.2025.3635635
DO - 10.1109/OJIES.2025.3635635
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:105022779878
SN - 2644-1284
VL - 6
SP - 1798
EP - 1820
JO - IEEE Open Journal of the Industrial Electronics Society
JF - IEEE Open Journal of the Industrial Electronics Society
ER -