Optimizing the tactile display of physiological information: Vibro-tactile vs. electro-tactile stimulation, and forearm or wrist location

  • G. Ng*
  • , P. Barralon
  • , G. Dumont
  • , S. K.W. Schwarz
  • , J. M. Ansermino
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Anesthesiologists use physiological data monitoring systems with visual and auditory displays of information to monitor patients in the operating room (OR). The efficacy of visual-audio systems may impose an increase in patient risk when the demand for constant switching of attention between the patient and the visual monitoring system is high. This is evidenced by auditory alarms frequently being neglected in a noisy OR environment. Hence, the use of a complementary patient data monitoring system, which utilizes other sensory modalities, could be of great value. In this paper, we describe a series of experiments designed to determine the performances of a tactile display that could be used to convey patient's physiological information to the attending anesthesiologist. We tested both vibro-tactile and electro-tactile display prototypes in their ability to convey information using an alert scheme of four distinct tactile stimuli. Using pseudo-clinical data, the display was designed, for example, to provide an alert when a change in the monitored heart rate occurred. Based on previous research in human physiology and psychophysics, we selected the forearm and wrist of the user's non-dominant hand as the stimulation site. In our study of 30 subjects, we evaluated the response time and accuracy of tactile pattern recognition to compare (1) the performance of a vibro-tactile display on the forearm (VF) and an electro-tactile display on the forearm (EF), and (2) the localization of stimulation between the forearm (VF) and a vibro-tactile display on the wrist (VW). A post-study questionnaire was completed by each subject to assess the comfort and usability of the three prototypes. We found that both VF and VW were superior to the EF in both accuracy and comfort and, that there were no differences between the wrist and the forearm. In conclusion, the tactile-display prototypes designed to alert the clinician of adverse changes in a patient's physiological state efficaciously and unobtrusively delivered these data and warranted further investigation and development.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication29th Annual International Conference of IEEE-EMBS, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC'07
Pages4202-4205
Number of pages4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2007
Externally publishedYes
Event29th Annual International Conference of IEEE-EMBS, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC'07 - Lyon, France
Duration: 23 Aug 200726 Aug 2007

Publication series

NameAnnual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology - Proceedings
ISSN (Print)0589-1019

Conference

Conference29th Annual International Conference of IEEE-EMBS, Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC'07
Country/TerritoryFrance
CityLyon
Period23/08/0726/08/07

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Optimizing the tactile display of physiological information: Vibro-tactile vs. electro-tactile stimulation, and forearm or wrist location'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this