TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality of urban climate adaptation plans over time
AU - Reckien, Diana
AU - Buzasi, Attila
AU - Olazabal, Marta
AU - Spyridaki, Niki Artemis
AU - Eckersley, Peter
AU - Simoes, Sofia G.
AU - Salvia, Monica
AU - Pietrapertosa, Filomena
AU - Fokaides, Paris
AU - Goonesekera, Sascha M.
AU - Tardieu, Léa
AU - Balzan, Mario V.
AU - de Boer, Cheryl L.
AU - De Gregorio Hurtado, Sonia
AU - Feliu, Efrén
AU - Flamos, Alexandros
AU - Foley, Aoife
AU - Geneletti, Davide
AU - Grafakos, Stelios
AU - Heidrich, Oliver
AU - Ioannou, Byron
AU - Krook-Riekkola, Anna
AU - Matosovic, Marko
AU - Orru, Hans
AU - Orru, Kati
AU - Paspaldzhiev, Ivan
AU - Rižnar, Klavdija
AU - Smigaj, Magdalena
AU - Szalmáné Csete, Maria
AU - Viguié, Vincent
AU - Wejs, Anja
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - Defining and measuring progress in adaptation are important questions for climate adaptation science, policy, and practice. Here, we assess the progress of urban adaptation planning in 327 European cities between 2005 and 2020 using three ‘ADAptation plan Quality Assessment’ indices, called ADAQA-1/ 2/ 3, that combine six plan quality principles. Half of the cities have an adaptation plan and its quality significantly increased over time. However, generally, plan quality is still low in many cities. Participation and monitoring and evaluation are particularly weak aspects in urban adaptation policy, together with plan ‘consistency’. Consistency connects impacts and vulnerabilities with adaptation goals, planned measures, actions, monitoring and evaluation, and participation processes. Consistency is a key factor in the overall quality of plans. To help evaluate the quality of plans and policies and promote learning, we suggest incorporating our ADAptation plan Quality Assessment indices into the portfolio of adaptation progress assessments and tracking methodologies.
AB - Defining and measuring progress in adaptation are important questions for climate adaptation science, policy, and practice. Here, we assess the progress of urban adaptation planning in 327 European cities between 2005 and 2020 using three ‘ADAptation plan Quality Assessment’ indices, called ADAQA-1/ 2/ 3, that combine six plan quality principles. Half of the cities have an adaptation plan and its quality significantly increased over time. However, generally, plan quality is still low in many cities. Participation and monitoring and evaluation are particularly weak aspects in urban adaptation policy, together with plan ‘consistency’. Consistency connects impacts and vulnerabilities with adaptation goals, planned measures, actions, monitoring and evaluation, and participation processes. Consistency is a key factor in the overall quality of plans. To help evaluate the quality of plans and policies and promote learning, we suggest incorporating our ADAptation plan Quality Assessment indices into the portfolio of adaptation progress assessments and tracking methodologies.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85161781023&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s42949-023-00085-1
DO - 10.1038/s42949-023-00085-1
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85161781023
SN - 2661-8001
VL - 3
JO - npj Urban Sustainability
JF - npj Urban Sustainability
IS - 1
M1 - 13
ER -