Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Quality of urban climate adaptation plans over time

  • Diana Reckien*
  • , Attila Buzasi
  • , Marta Olazabal
  • , Niki Artemis Spyridaki
  • , Peter Eckersley
  • , Sofia G. Simoes
  • , Monica Salvia
  • , Filomena Pietrapertosa
  • , Paris Fokaides
  • , Sascha M. Goonesekera
  • , Léa Tardieu
  • , Mario V. Balzan
  • , Cheryl L. de Boer
  • , Sonia De Gregorio Hurtado
  • , Efrén Feliu
  • , Alexandros Flamos
  • , Aoife Foley
  • , Davide Geneletti
  • , Stelios Grafakos
  • , Oliver Heidrich
  • Byron Ioannou, Anna Krook-Riekkola, Marko Matosovic, Hans Orru, Kati Orru, Ivan Paspaldzhiev, Klavdija Rižnar, Magdalena Smigaj, Maria Szalmáné Csete, Vincent Viguié, Anja Wejs
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Twente
  • Budapest University of Technology and Economics
  • BC3 Basque Centre for Climate Change
  • Ikerbasque, Basque Foundation for Science
  • University of Piraeus
  • Nottingham Trent University
  • Leibniz Institute for Research on Society and Space
  • National Laboratory of Energy and Geology
  • National Research Council of Italy
  • NBFC
  • Frederick University
  • 26 1°
  • Université de Montpellier
  • Université Paris-Saclay
  • Malta College of Arts, Science & Technology
  • Corradino
  • Technical University of Madrid
  • University of Manchester
  • Queen's University Belfast
  • University of Trento
  • The Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI)
  • Newcastle University
  • Luleå University of Technology
  • PricewaterhouseCoopers
  • University of Tartu
  • Umeå University
  • Denkstatt Bulgaria Ltd
  • Slovenski Trg 6
  • Wageningen University & Research
  • NIRAS A/S
  • Aalborg University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

84 Citations (Scopus)
3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Defining and measuring progress in adaptation are important questions for climate adaptation science, policy, and practice. Here, we assess the progress of urban adaptation planning in 327 European cities between 2005 and 2020 using three ‘ADAptation plan Quality Assessment’ indices, called ADAQA-1/ 2/ 3, that combine six plan quality principles. Half of the cities have an adaptation plan and its quality significantly increased over time. However, generally, plan quality is still low in many cities. Participation and monitoring and evaluation are particularly weak aspects in urban adaptation policy, together with plan ‘consistency’. Consistency connects impacts and vulnerabilities with adaptation goals, planned measures, actions, monitoring and evaluation, and participation processes. Consistency is a key factor in the overall quality of plans. To help evaluate the quality of plans and policies and promote learning, we suggest incorporating our ADAptation plan Quality Assessment indices into the portfolio of adaptation progress assessments and tracking methodologies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number13
Journalnpj Urban Sustainability
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2023

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
    SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Quality of urban climate adaptation plans over time'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this