TY - GEN
T1 - Safety and Security Co-engineering and Argumentation Framework
AU - Martin, H.
AU - Bramberger, R.
AU - Schmittner, C.
AU - Ma, Z.
AU - Gruber, T.
AU - Ruiz, A.
AU - Macher, G.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Automotive systems become increasingly complex due to their functional range and data exchange with the outside world. Until now, functional safety of such safety-critical electrical/electronic systems has been covered successfully. However, the data exchange requires interconnection across trusted boundaries of the vehicle. This leads to security issues like hacking and malicious attacks against interfaces, which could bring up new types of safety issues. Before mass-production of automotive systems, arguments supported by evidences are required regarding safety and security. Product engineering must be compliant to specific standards and must support arguments that the system is free of unreasonable risks.
This paper shows a safety and security co-engineering framework, which covers standard compliant process derivation and management, and supports product specific safety and security co-analysis. Furthermore, we investigate process- and product-related argumentation and apply the approach to an automotive use case regarding safety and security.
AB - Automotive systems become increasingly complex due to their functional range and data exchange with the outside world. Until now, functional safety of such safety-critical electrical/electronic systems has been covered successfully. However, the data exchange requires interconnection across trusted boundaries of the vehicle. This leads to security issues like hacking and malicious attacks against interfaces, which could bring up new types of safety issues. Before mass-production of automotive systems, arguments supported by evidences are required regarding safety and security. Product engineering must be compliant to specific standards and must support arguments that the system is free of unreasonable risks.
This paper shows a safety and security co-engineering framework, which covers standard compliant process derivation and management, and supports product specific safety and security co-analysis. Furthermore, we investigate process- and product-related argumentation and apply the approach to an automotive use case regarding safety and security.
KW - Safety and security co-engineering
KW - Process- and product-based argumentation
KW - Process and argumentation patterns
KW - Automotive domain
KW - ISO 26262
KW - SAE J3061
KW - Safety and security co-engineering
KW - Process- and product-based argumentation
KW - Process and argumentation patterns
KW - Automotive domain
KW - ISO 26262
KW - SAE J3061
KW - Process-and product-based argumentation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85029540878&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-66284-8_24
DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-66284-8_24
M3 - Conference contribution
SN - 978-3-319-66283-1
SN - 9783319662831
VL - 10489
T3 - 0302-9743
SP - 286
EP - 297
BT - unknown
A2 - Bitsch, Friedemann
A2 - Tonetta, Stefano
A2 - Schoitsch, Erwin
PB - Springer, Cham
T2 - International Conference on Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security, SAFECOMP 2017 and 5th International Workshop on Assurance Cases for Software-Intensive Systems, ASSURE 2017, 12th Workshop on Dependable Embedded and Cyber-physical Systems and Systems-of Systems, DECSoS 2017, 6th International Workshop on Next Generation of System Assurance Approaches for Safety Critical Systems, SASSUR 2017, 3rd International Workshop on Technical and Legal Aspects of Data Privacy and Security, TELERISE 2017 and 2nd International Workshop on the Timing Performance in Safety Engineering, TIPS 2017
Y2 - 12 September 2017 through 12 September 2017
ER -
