TY - JOUR
T1 - Smart Protocols for Physical Therapy of Foot Drop Based on Functional Electrical Stimulation: A Case Study
T2 - A case study
AU - Malešević, Jovana
AU - Konstantinović, Ljubica
AU - Bijelić, Goran
AU - Malešević, Nebojša
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/4/26
Y1 - 2021/4/26
N2 - Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is used for treating foot drop by delivering electrical
pulses to the anterior tibialis muscle during the swing phase of gait. This treatment requires that
a patient can walk, which is mostly possible in the later phases of rehabilitation. In the early
phase of recovery, the therapy conventionally consists of stretching exercises, and less commonly
of FES delivered cyclically. Nevertheless, both approaches minimize patient engagement, which
is inconsistent with recent findings that the full rehabilitation potential could be achieved by an
active psycho-physical engagement of the patient during physical therapy. Following this notion,
we proposed smart protocols whereby the patient sits and ankle movements are FES-induced by
self-control. In six smart protocols, movements of the paretic ankle were governed by the non-paretic
ankle with different control strategies, while in the seventh voluntary movements of the paretic ankle
were used for stimulation triggering. One stroke survivor in the acute phase of recovery participated
in the study. During the therapy, the patient’s voluntary ankle range of motion increased and reached
the value of normal gait after 15 sessions. Statistical analysis did not reveal the differences between
the protocols in FES-induced movements.
AB - Functional electrical stimulation (FES) is used for treating foot drop by delivering electrical
pulses to the anterior tibialis muscle during the swing phase of gait. This treatment requires that
a patient can walk, which is mostly possible in the later phases of rehabilitation. In the early
phase of recovery, the therapy conventionally consists of stretching exercises, and less commonly
of FES delivered cyclically. Nevertheless, both approaches minimize patient engagement, which
is inconsistent with recent findings that the full rehabilitation potential could be achieved by an
active psycho-physical engagement of the patient during physical therapy. Following this notion,
we proposed smart protocols whereby the patient sits and ankle movements are FES-induced by
self-control. In six smart protocols, movements of the paretic ankle were governed by the non-paretic
ankle with different control strategies, while in the seventh voluntary movements of the paretic ankle
were used for stimulation triggering. One stroke survivor in the acute phase of recovery participated
in the study. During the therapy, the patient’s voluntary ankle range of motion increased and reached
the value of normal gait after 15 sessions. Statistical analysis did not reveal the differences between
the protocols in FES-induced movements.
KW - Functional electrical stimulation
KW - Foot drop
KW - Smart protocols
KW - Physical therapy
KW - Contralateral control
KW - Range of motion
KW - Stroke
KW - Functional electrical stimulation
KW - Foot drop
KW - Smart protocols
KW - Physical therapy
KW - Contralateral control
KW - Range of motion
KW - Stroke
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85105499481&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/healthcare9050502
DO - 10.3390/healthcare9050502
M3 - Article
SN - 2227-9032
VL - 9
SP - 502
JO - Healthcare
JF - Healthcare
IS - 5
M1 - 502
ER -