The influence of electrode size on selectivity and comfort in transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the forearm

Andreas Kuhn, Thierry Keller, Marc Lawrence, Manfred Morari

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) is a technique to artificially activate motor nerves and muscles. It can be used for rehabilitation or the restoration of lost motor functions, e.g., in subjects with brain or spinal cord lesions. Apart from selectively activating motor nerves and muscles, TES activates sensory fibers and pain receptors, producing discomfort and pain. Clinicians try to minimize discomfort by optimizing stimulation parameters, electrode location, and electrode size. There are some studies that found optimal electrode sizes for certain stimulation sites (e.g., gastrocnemius), however the underlying effects why certain electrode sizes are preferred by patients is not well understood. We used a TES model consisting of a finite element (FE) model and a nerve model to assess the influence of different electrode sizes on the selectivity and the perceived comfort for various anatomies. Motor thresholds calculated using the TES model were compared with motor thresholds that were obtained from measurements performed on the forearm of ten human volunteers. Results of the TES model indicate that small electrodes (0.8 × 0.8 cm2) are more comfortable for thin fat layers (0.25 cm) and superficial nerves (0.1 cm) and larger electrodes (4.1 × 4.1 cm2) are more comfortable for thicker fat layers (2 cm) and deeper nerves (1.1 cm) at a constant recruitment.

Original languageEnglish
Article number5378632
Pages (from-to)255-262
Number of pages8
JournalIEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering
Volume18
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

Keywords

  • Comfort
  • Electrode size
  • Finite element model
  • Transcutaneous electrical stimulation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The influence of electrode size on selectivity and comfort in transcutaneous electrical stimulation of the forearm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this