Abstract
The renovation of buildings has a high capacity to influence the environmental impacts and global objectives of climate change mitigation. In the context of designing low-energy buildings with minimized environmental impacts, the life cycle assessment (LCA) has been proven a straightforward method, to evaluate the direct and indirect environmental impacts of a building concept. Even though it is the most energy-intensive element, the use phase is not only a source of environmental concern but also the whole life cycle of the building and its components. However, energy-efficient renovation decisions tend to be financially motivated events, subject to exogenous constraints or barriers, that do not integrate whole life cycle thinking. This study aims to identify how the LCA information can be considered in comparing renovation options. compare renovation options, taking into account the modular envelope system developed as part of the European research project ENSNARE (ENvelope meSh aNd digitAl framework for building Renovation) case study. The study analysed different renovation scenarios, generated according to combinations of renewable energy sources and compare them to the base case and typical renovation scenario. Such information can support the design team in making decisions that consider the whole building and its components' life cycles.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 152024 |
Journal | Journal of Physics: Conference Series |
Volume | 2600 |
Issue number | 15 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2023 |
Event | 2023 International Conference on the Built Environment in Transition, CISBAT 2023 - Hybrid, Lausanne, Switzerland Duration: 13 Sept 2023 → 15 Sept 2023 |
Funding
This study has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program-me under grant agreement ID 958445. This paper reflects only the authors’ views and neither the Agency nor the Commission are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein. This study has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement ID 958445. This paper reflects only the authors’ views and neither the Agency nor the Commission are responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein.
Funders | Funder number |
---|---|
Commission | |
European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program-me | |
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme | ID 958445 |