Resumen
The authors regret that in the version of this article initially published, there was an error in the discussion section. Specifically, on page 21 it was erroneously reported that more negativity was present for the congruent condition, whereas more negativity was actually observed for the incongruent condition, as we correctly reported in results section on page 17. We also reported that this effect was similar to one previously reported finding (Kovic et al., 2010), but would like to clarify that the similarity is only in timing, and not polarity. This descriptive error does not alter the interpretation of the results. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
Idioma original | Inglés |
---|---|
Páginas (desde-hasta) | 58 |
Número de páginas | 1 |
Publicación | Brain and Language |
Volumen | 155-156 |
DOI |
|
Estado | Publicada - 1 abr 2016 |