Resumen
The authors regret that in the version of this article initially published, there was an error in the discussion section. Specifically, on page 21 it was erroneously reported that more negativity was present for the congruent condition, whereas more negativity was actually observed for the incongruent condition, as we correctly reported in results section on page 17. We also reported that this effect was similar to one previously reported finding (Kovic et al., 2010), but would like to clarify that the similarity is only in timing, and not polarity. This descriptive error does not alter the interpretation of the results. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
| Idioma original | Inglés |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 58 |
| Número de páginas | 1 |
| Publicación | Brain and Language |
| Volumen | 155-156 |
| DOI |
|
| Estado | Publicada - 1 abr 2016 |
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Erratum: Corrigendum to “Balloons and bavoons vs spikes and shikes: ERPs reveal shared neural processes for shape-sound-meaning congruence in words, and shape-sound congruence in pseudowords” (Brain and Language (2015) 145–146 (11–22) (S0093934X15000760) (10.1016/j.bandl.2015.03.011))'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Producción científica
- 1 Artículo
-
Balloons and bavoons versus spikes and shikes: ERPs reveal shared neural processes for shape–sound-meaning congruence in words, and shape–sound congruence in pseudowords: ERPs reveal shared neural processes for shape-sound-meaning congruence in words, and shape-sound congruence in pseudowords
Sučević, J., Savić, A. M., Popović, M. B., Styles, S. J. & Ković, V., 1 jun 2015, En: Brain and Language. 145-146, p. 11-22 12 p.Producción científica: Contribución a una revista › Artículo › revisión exhaustiva
24 Citas (Scopus)
Citar esto
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver