Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Moderate Certainty Evidence Suggests the Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Does Not Decrease Hypoxia When Compared With Conventional Oxygen Therapy in the Peri-Intubation Period: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Dipayan Chaudhuri
  • , David Granton
  • , Dominic Xiang Wang
  • , Sharon Einav
  • , Yigal Helviz
  • , Tommaso Mauri
  • , Jean Damien Ricard
  • , Jordi Mancebo
  • , Jean Pierre Frat
  • , Sameer Jog
  • , Gonzalo Hernandez
  • , Salvatore M. Maggiore
  • , Carol Hodgson
  • , Samir Jaber
  • , Laurent Brochard
  • , Karen E.A. Burns
  • , Bram Rochwerg*
  • *Autor correspondiente de este trabajo
  • McMaster University
  • Western University
  • Shaare Zedek Medical Center
  • Hebrew University of Jerusalem
  • University of Milan
  • Hôpital Louis Mourier
  • Université de Paris
  • Hospital Universitari Sant Pau
  • CHU de Poitiers
  • Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
  • Université de Poitiers
  • Deenanath Mangeshkar Hospital and Research Centre
  • Hospital Infanta Sofía
  • Gabriele d'Annunzio University
  • Monash University
  • CHU Montpellier
  • University of Toronto

Producción científica: Contribución a una revistaArtículo de revisiónrevisión exhaustiva

35 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Objective: The role of high-flow nasal cannula during and before intubation is unclear despite a number of randomized clinical trials. Our objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis examining the benefits of high-flow nasal cannula in the peri-intubation period. Data Sources: We performed a comprehensive search of relevant databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science). Study Selection: We included randomized clinical trials that compared high-flow nasal cannula to other noninvasive oxygen delivery systems in the peri-intubation period. Data Extraction: Our primary outcome was severe desaturation (defined as peripheral oxygen saturation reading < 80% during intubation). Secondary outcomes included peri-intubation complications, apneic time, Pao2before and after intubation, Paco2after intubation, ICU length of stay, and short-term mortality. Data Synthesis: We included 10 randomized clinical trials (n = 1,017 patients). High-flow nasal cannula had no effect on the occurrence rate of peri-intubation hypoxemia (relative risk, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.68-1.42; 0.3% absolute risk reduction, moderate certainty), serious complications (relative risk, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.71-1.06), apneic time (mean difference, 10.3 s higher with high-flow nasal cannula; 95% CI, 11.0 s lower to 31.7 s higher), Pao2measured after preoxygenation (mean difference, 3.6 mm Hg higher; 95% CI, 3.5 mm Hg lower to 10.7 mm Hg higher), or Pao2measured after intubation (mean difference, 27.0 mm Hg higher; 95% CI, 13.2 mm Hg lower to 67.2 mm Hg higher), when compared with conventional oxygen therapy. There was also no effect on postintubation Paco2, ICU length of stay, or 28-day mortality. Conclusions: We found moderate-to-low certainty evidence that the use of high-flow nasal cannula likely has no effect on severe desaturation, serious complications, apneic time, oxygenation, ICU length of stay, or overall survival when used in the peri-intubation period when compared with conventional oxygen therapy.

Idioma originalInglés
Páginas (desde-hasta)571-578
Número de páginas8
PublicaciónCritical Care Medicine
Volumen48
N.º4
DOI
EstadoPublicada - 1 abr 2020
Publicado de forma externa

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Moderate Certainty Evidence Suggests the Use of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Does Not Decrease Hypoxia When Compared With Conventional Oxygen Therapy in the Peri-Intubation Period: Results of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto