Review of the BCI competition IV

Michael Tangermann; Klaus Robert Müller; Ad Aertsen; Niels Birbaumer; Christoph Braun; Clemens Brunner; Robert Leeb; Carsten Mehring; Kai J. Miller; Gernot R. Müller-Putz; Guido Nolte; Gert Pfurtscheller; Hubert Preissl; Gerwin Schalk; Alois Schlögl; Carmen Vidaurre; Stephan Waldert; Benjamin Blankertz

doi:10.3389/fnins.2012.00055

Review of the BCI competition IV

Michael Tangermann^*
, Klaus Robert Müller
, Ad Aertsen
, Niels Birbaumer
, Christoph Braun
, Clemens Brunner
, Robert Leeb
, Carsten Mehring
, Kai J. Miller
, Gernot R. Müller-Putz
, Guido Nolte
, Gert Pfurtscheller
, Hubert Preissl
, Gerwin Schalk
, Alois Schlögl
, Carmen Vidaurre
, Stephan Waldert
, Benjamin Blankertz

^*Autor correspondiente de este trabajo

Technical University of Berlin
Korea University
University of Tübingen
San Camillo Hospital
University of Trento
Graz University of Technology
University of California at San Diego
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne
Imperial College London
University of Washington
University of Hamburg
University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Wadsworth Center for Laboratories and Research
Albany Medical College
Washington University St. Louis
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
SUNY Albany
Institute of Science and Technology Austria
University College London

Producción científica: Contribución a una revista › Artículo de revisión › revisión exhaustiva

1199 Citas (Scopus)

1 Descargas (Pure)

Resumen

The BCI competition IV stands in the tradition of prior BCI competitions that aim to provide high quality neuroscientific data for open access to the scientific community. As experienced already in prior competitions not only scientists from the narrow field of BCI compete, but scholars with a broad variety of backgrounds and nationalities. They include high specialists as well as students.The goals of all BCI competitions have always been to challenge with respect to novel paradigms and complex data. We report on the following challenges: (1) asynchronous data, (2) synthetic, (3) multi-class continuous data, (4) sessionto-session transfer, (5) directionally modulated MEG, (6) finger movements recorded by ECoG. As after past competitions, our hope is that winning entries may enhance the analysis methods of future BCIs.

Idioma original	Inglés
Número de artículo	55
Publicación	Frontiers in Neuroscience
N.º	JULY
DOI	https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00055
Estado	Publicada - 2012
Publicado de forma externa	Sí

Acceder al documento

10.3389/fnins.2012.00055Licencia: CC BY

Review ot he BCILicencia: CC BY

Otros archivos y enlaces

Enlace a la publicación en Scopus

Citar esto

Tangermann, M., Müller, K. R., Aertsen, A., Birbaumer, N., Braun, C., Brunner, C., Leeb, R., Mehring, C., Miller, K. J., Müller-Putz, G. R., Nolte, G., Pfurtscheller, G., Preissl, H., Schalk, G., Schlögl, A., Vidaurre, C., Waldert, S., & Blankertz, B. (2012). Review of the BCI competition IV. Frontiers in Neuroscience, (JULY), Artículo 55. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2012.00055

@article{d080b2a4a1994d3e8eb9305c374f484e,

title = "Review of the BCI competition IV",

abstract = "The BCI competition IV stands in the tradition of prior BCI competitions that aim to provide high quality neuroscientific data for open access to the scientific community. As experienced already in prior competitions not only scientists from the narrow field of BCI compete, but scholars with a broad variety of backgrounds and nationalities. They include high specialists as well as students.The goals of all BCI competitions have always been to challenge with respect to novel paradigms and complex data. We report on the following challenges: (1) asynchronous data, (2) synthetic, (3) multi-class continuous data, (4) sessionto-session transfer, (5) directionally modulated MEG, (6) finger movements recorded by ECoG. As after past competitions, our hope is that winning entries may enhance the analysis methods of future BCIs.",

keywords = "Bci, Brain-computer interface, Competition",

author = "Michael Tangermann and M{\"u}ller, \{Klaus Robert\} and Ad Aertsen and Niels Birbaumer and Christoph Braun and Clemens Brunner and Robert Leeb and Carsten Mehring and Miller, \{Kai J.\} and M{\"u}ller-Putz, \{Gernot R.\} and Guido Nolte and Gert Pfurtscheller and Hubert Preissl and Gerwin Schalk and Alois Schl{\"o}gl and Carmen Vidaurre and Stephan Waldert and Benjamin Blankertz",

year = "2012",

doi = "10.3389/fnins.2012.00055",

language = "English",

journal = "Frontiers in Neuroscience",

issn = "1662-4548",

publisher = "Frontiers Media S.A.",

number = "JULY",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Review of the BCI competition IV

AU - Tangermann, Michael

AU - Müller, Klaus Robert

AU - Aertsen, Ad

AU - Birbaumer, Niels

AU - Braun, Christoph

AU - Brunner, Clemens

AU - Leeb, Robert

AU - Mehring, Carsten

AU - Miller, Kai J.

AU - Müller-Putz, Gernot R.

AU - Nolte, Guido

AU - Pfurtscheller, Gert

AU - Preissl, Hubert

AU - Schalk, Gerwin

AU - Schlögl, Alois

AU - Vidaurre, Carmen

AU - Waldert, Stephan

AU - Blankertz, Benjamin

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - The BCI competition IV stands in the tradition of prior BCI competitions that aim to provide high quality neuroscientific data for open access to the scientific community. As experienced already in prior competitions not only scientists from the narrow field of BCI compete, but scholars with a broad variety of backgrounds and nationalities. They include high specialists as well as students.The goals of all BCI competitions have always been to challenge with respect to novel paradigms and complex data. We report on the following challenges: (1) asynchronous data, (2) synthetic, (3) multi-class continuous data, (4) sessionto-session transfer, (5) directionally modulated MEG, (6) finger movements recorded by ECoG. As after past competitions, our hope is that winning entries may enhance the analysis methods of future BCIs.

AB - The BCI competition IV stands in the tradition of prior BCI competitions that aim to provide high quality neuroscientific data for open access to the scientific community. As experienced already in prior competitions not only scientists from the narrow field of BCI compete, but scholars with a broad variety of backgrounds and nationalities. They include high specialists as well as students.The goals of all BCI competitions have always been to challenge with respect to novel paradigms and complex data. We report on the following challenges: (1) asynchronous data, (2) synthetic, (3) multi-class continuous data, (4) sessionto-session transfer, (5) directionally modulated MEG, (6) finger movements recorded by ECoG. As after past competitions, our hope is that winning entries may enhance the analysis methods of future BCIs.

KW - Bci

KW - Brain-computer interface

KW - Competition

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84857805414

U2 - 10.3389/fnins.2012.00055

DO - 10.3389/fnins.2012.00055

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84857805414

SN - 1662-4548

JO - Frontiers in Neuroscience

JF - Frontiers in Neuroscience

IS - JULY

M1 - 55

ER -

Review of the BCI competition IV

Resumen

Acceder al documento

Otros archivos y enlaces

Huella

Citar esto