TY - JOUR
T1 - Some investigations into the optimal dimensional synthesis of parallel robots
AU - Kelaiaia, Ridha
AU - Zaatri, Abdelouahab
AU - Company, Olivier
AU - Chikh, Lotfi
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015, Springer-Verlag London.
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - In this paper, we will perform a comparison between two approaches of dimensional synthesis of parallel robots. The first one concerns the single-objective optimization approach; in this case, the dimensional synthesis is expressed by taking into account only one performance criterion but enables to get a final solution if it exists. The second one concerns the multi-objective optimization approach; it enables to simultaneously take into account several performance criteria. However, this approach appears to provide a set of solutions instead of a single expected final solution which should directly enable to carry out the structural synthesis. In fact, the search of a single final solution is postponed to a further step where the designers have to impose and/or restrict certain parameters. And we will establish if it is really necessary to make a multi-objective optimization approach or if a single-objective is sufficient to reach the objectives set in the specifications (user requirements). A discussion is proposed concerning the arising questions related to each approach and leading to the optimal dimensional synthesis. The PAR2 robot with two degree-of-freedom is used to exemplify the analysis and the comparison of the two approaches. The proposed comparison can be applied to any classes of parallel robots.
AB - In this paper, we will perform a comparison between two approaches of dimensional synthesis of parallel robots. The first one concerns the single-objective optimization approach; in this case, the dimensional synthesis is expressed by taking into account only one performance criterion but enables to get a final solution if it exists. The second one concerns the multi-objective optimization approach; it enables to simultaneously take into account several performance criteria. However, this approach appears to provide a set of solutions instead of a single expected final solution which should directly enable to carry out the structural synthesis. In fact, the search of a single final solution is postponed to a further step where the designers have to impose and/or restrict certain parameters. And we will establish if it is really necessary to make a multi-objective optimization approach or if a single-objective is sufficient to reach the objectives set in the specifications (user requirements). A discussion is proposed concerning the arising questions related to each approach and leading to the optimal dimensional synthesis. The PAR2 robot with two degree-of-freedom is used to exemplify the analysis and the comparison of the two approaches. The proposed comparison can be applied to any classes of parallel robots.
KW - Criteria of performance
KW - Dimensional synthesis
KW - Genetic algorithm NSGA-II
KW - Multi-objective optimization
KW - PAR2 robot
KW - Single-objective optimization
KW - SQP
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84939220163&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00170-015-7611-3
DO - 10.1007/s00170-015-7611-3
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84939220163
SN - 0268-3768
VL - 83
SP - 1525
EP - 1538
JO - International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
JF - International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology
IS - 9-12
ER -