Techno-economic analysis of processes with integration of fluidized bed heat exchangers for H₂ production – Part 2: Chemical-looping combustion

This work covers a techno-economic assessment for processes with inherent CO₂ separation, where a fluidized bed heat exchanger (FBHE) is used as heat source for steam reforming in a hydrogen production plant. This article builds upon the work presented in Part 1 of this study by Stenberg et al. [1], where a process excluding CO₂ capture was examined. Part 2 suggests two process configurations integrating steam reforming with a chemical-looping combustion (CLC) system, thus providing inherent CO₂ capture. The first system (case CM) uses natural gas as supplementary fuel whereas the second system (case CB) uses solid biomass, which enables net negative CO₂ emissions. In both systems, the reformer tubes are immersed in a bubbling fluidized bed where heat for steam reforming is efficiently transferred to the tubes. The processes include CO₂ compression for pipeline transportation, but excludes transport and storage. The CLC system is designed based on key parameters, such as the oxygen carrier circulation rate and oxygen transport capacity. The first system displays a process with net zero emissions and a hydrogen production efficiency which is estimated to 76.2%, which is almost 8% higher than the conventional process. The levelized production cost is 1.6% lower at below 2.6 €/kg H₂. The second system shows the possibility to reduce the emissions to −34.1 g CO₂/MJ_H2 compared to the conventional plant which emits 80.7 g CO₂/MJ_H2. The hydrogen production efficiency is above 72% and around 2% higher than the conventional process. The capital investments are higher in this plant and the levelized hydrogen production cost is estimated to around 2.67 €/kg. The cost of CO₂ avoidance, based on a reference SMR plant with CO₂ capture, is low for both cases (−4.3 €/ton_CO2 for case CM and 2.7 €/ton_CO2 for case CB).